Definition: Now the acts of Rehoboam, first and last, [are] they not written in the book of Shemaiah the prophet, and of Iddo the seer concerning genealogies? And [there were] wars between Rehoboam and Jeroboam continually.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse. It’s a bit complex, but here's my explanation in plain language: “2 Chronicles 12:15 Now the acts of Rehoboam, first and last, [are] they not written in the book of Shemaiah the prophet, and of Iddo the seer concerning genealogies? And [there were] wars between Rehoboam and Jeroboam continually.” Basically, this verse is saying that there was a long series of conflicts between two kings called Rehoboam and Jeroboam. Let’s unpack it further: “The acts of Rehoboam…” : This refers to the reign of King Rehoboam. “…first and last” : This is important – it means this conflict happened over a period of time, with multiple phases. “[are] they not written in the book of Shemaiah the prophet?” : This suggests that some details about this conflict were recorded in a specific prophetic text called “Shemaiah.” Think of it as an ancient record or story. “And of Iddo the seer concerning genealogies?” : This refers to a scroll (or record) kept by a person named Iddo. This scroll likely documented the details of these wars, including who was fighting whom and when. “And [there were] wars between Rehoboam and Jeroboam continually.” : This is the core of the verse – there were ongoing battles between these two kings. It wasn’t a single event, but a long-running struggle for power. What does this tell us? This verse hints at a period of significant political instability in Israel. It suggests that the conflict wasn't just a one-off battle; it was a pattern of repeated struggles between these two kings. It paints a picture of a kingdom divided and potentially facing challenges. --- Important Note: This is a relatively complex passage, and different interpretations exist among biblical scholars. But this explanation aims to provide a clear understanding of the core meaning within the context of the Bible. Do you want me to explain anything in more detail or perhaps delve into a specific aspect of this verse? For example: Why might this be considered significant? What does it tell us about the relationship between these two kings?